Themabewertung:
  • 0 Bewertung(en) - 0 im Durchschnitt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
xywt Familiarity breeds contempt for India and Sri Lanka
#1
Gllq A divided household Daughter in PTI father in PPP
WASHINGTON:A US government-appointed panel urged Washington Tuesday to step up pressure on Pakistan over reli yeezys gious freedom, warning that risks to its minorities have reached a crisis level.In an annual report, the US Commission on International Religious Freedom also raised concerns about what it called a worsening situation in China, as well as problems in Egypt, Iran, Myanmar, Saudi Arabia and other nations.The commission, which advises the government but does not make decisions, called for the United States to designate Pakistan, among eight other countries dunk nike store , as a country of particular concern, meaning it could be subject to sanctions if it fail yeezy 700 s to improve.Assessing the year through January 31, the commission said religious freedom violations in Pakistan rose to unprecedented levels due to chronic sectarian violence that targeted the Shia Muslim minority. The government continues to fail to protect Christians, Ahmadis and Hindus, the report said, charging that blasphemy and oth The government has enacted wide-ranging reforms through the recent nike air max97 Companies (Amendment) Ordinance 2020, which have been welcomed by large segments of the business community and international agencies, said the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP).It added that under Section 153(m) of the Companies Act 2017 (the Act), a person convicted by the court of law for any offence involving moral turpitude, which includes, but not limited to, offences of corruption and corrupt practices as provided in the NAO 1999 is ineligible to hold office of a director in a company.Furthermore, under Section 172, the commission has powers to disqualify any person who, despite ineligibility as provided under the law, continues to hold office of a director in a comp stanley brand any. The SECP clarified that the omission of 172(m) from the Companies Act is only aimed at removing duplication and potential conflict of laws, and at the same time ensuring t nike 95 hat the application of Section 153 and 172 is not subje
Zitieren


Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste